>400 subscribers


A creator’s purpose is expression. To release what’s inside so the world can connect through how it made someone feel, how it resonated at a primal level. Getting the thoughts and feelings of the moment into the open. This expression doesn't start with the monetary expectations but expectation that maybe someone out there connects to the feelings of the creator.
Don't misunderstand the fact that creators like to earn like everyone else.
Some seek jobs to harness that creativity for commercial use. But the motivation to earn is not the driver at the core of a creator - it’s the necessity to exist in a world where expression typically doesn’t pay the rent.
So, did web3 merge possibility of exposure, earning capacity and expression? Yeah, I think so.
But the creator economy may not encompass a creator’s token.
If we consider a creator’s token as an extension of the creator & not a “betting on you” or “invested in your success” mindset, we can expand the use of this technology beyond focus of financial gain.
The framework or earning inside the creator’s economy is baked.
Attaching a creator's token inside this framework adds no additional value that isn’t already in play.
Creators have earning mechanics already established via NFTs. Does this piece connect with you? Does it have mass appeal? Speculate away. Own it, hold it, enjoy it. That layer exists. It works.
We already have other ways to show support: tip someone, buy some app coins to support someone’s live stream. Again, we're still duplicating prior mechanics no different than what we see in Web2. Replication of support rails and ownership rails are here, but why think that is where we stop and simply label a creator's token as yet another way to "show support?"
We’ve built sophisticated systems for monetization: Bonding curves. Smart contracts. Token-gated access. The infrastructure for extracting value from creative work is mature. But maybe, we’ve gotten so good at monetizing connection that we’ve forgotten connection itself has value worth recording.
We need a layer above the creator economy, not inside it. This isn't a plea to abandon creator's token, but to harness a different culture and use case that isn't attempting to turn humans into commodities. A chance to stop forcing another culture not designed for humans but embed the correct culture into the use case.
What if the intangible becomes tangible because of the tech?
The moment you felt a connection. The moment your view changed. The moment someone changed your life.
We all have influence from others: the blog that opened your eyes, that artwork that made you ponder, the speaker that changed your understanding of the world or yourself.
Think about the last time someone’s work fundamentally shifted something in you. Maybe it was a thread that reframed how you think about your career. A piece of art that surfaced an emotion you’d been suppressing. A song that became the soundtrack to a transformation you were already experiencing but couldn’t name yet.
You probably never told them. Even if you did, that moment dissolved into the stream. A like. A comment. Maybe a DM that got buried. The impact was real but the record is ephemeral.
Maybe that’s the intangible we should be recording with creator tokens. Those human moments that we can’t take a picture of but we can now preserve on a ledger.
If we expand beyond the use case of monetary reward, we find this technology may allow us to document our human-to-human connection.
Let the creator economy live on and thrive.
Buy the NFT, support the livestream, collect the blog, snag the post.
Now let’s add the creator’s connection that transcends the economy and bridges the element of us.
The financial rails exist. What we’re missing are the relational rails.
This isn’t about replacing markets with sentiment. It’s about acknowledging that influence flows through channels we’ve never been able to map. When someone’s work changes you, that’s not a transaction - it’s a transmission. And transmissions deserves its own infrastructure and purpose.
We exist in a living world where the reason we lean on social media is to connect, to engage. Creator's tokens may become representative of those moments of connection beyond the post, beyond the collected, and tracking that bond we have in our living world.
Speculation comes when we remove the us from our worldview. There’s plenty of speculation areas that exist in the casino culture, but this creator/human element may not be one of them.
This may be the pivotal moment where we come back to center and understand that the human element is what we must hold onto in a world where AI runs everything.
The thing creator's tokens provide is harnessing the tech for us, the humans, while we spotlight monetization via other tokenized vehicles. The missing focus is human and personal connection - which we constantly have a desire for, yet we keep trying to ignore it in the race to adopt everything to a token.
Gain becomes a byproduct when we prioritize connection/relationship. We fuse the intangible moments into the technology. We don't speculate or bet on success but prioritize relationships, connections, and feelings via the use of the technology.
A creator token highlights “this person or person's work changed how I see myself.” A record that says “your work was there when I needed it most.” An attestation that lives beyond platforms, beyond likes, beyond the noise.
Not because it unlocks perks. Not because it generates yield. Because the moment mattered and now it’s preserved on a ledger.
We don't need new tech. We’re simply harnessing the tech under new rules, new culture, new purpose. Thinking every use case for tokenization starts with speculation and earning capacity is limiting the ability to expand the technology.
We need to evolve cultures, not revolve around one.
A creator’s purpose is expression. To release what’s inside so the world can connect through how it made someone feel, how it resonated at a primal level. Getting the thoughts and feelings of the moment into the open. This expression doesn't start with the monetary expectations but expectation that maybe someone out there connects to the feelings of the creator.
Don't misunderstand the fact that creators like to earn like everyone else.
Some seek jobs to harness that creativity for commercial use. But the motivation to earn is not the driver at the core of a creator - it’s the necessity to exist in a world where expression typically doesn’t pay the rent.
So, did web3 merge possibility of exposure, earning capacity and expression? Yeah, I think so.
But the creator economy may not encompass a creator’s token.
If we consider a creator’s token as an extension of the creator & not a “betting on you” or “invested in your success” mindset, we can expand the use of this technology beyond focus of financial gain.
The framework or earning inside the creator’s economy is baked.
Attaching a creator's token inside this framework adds no additional value that isn’t already in play.
Creators have earning mechanics already established via NFTs. Does this piece connect with you? Does it have mass appeal? Speculate away. Own it, hold it, enjoy it. That layer exists. It works.
We already have other ways to show support: tip someone, buy some app coins to support someone’s live stream. Again, we're still duplicating prior mechanics no different than what we see in Web2. Replication of support rails and ownership rails are here, but why think that is where we stop and simply label a creator's token as yet another way to "show support?"
We’ve built sophisticated systems for monetization: Bonding curves. Smart contracts. Token-gated access. The infrastructure for extracting value from creative work is mature. But maybe, we’ve gotten so good at monetizing connection that we’ve forgotten connection itself has value worth recording.
We need a layer above the creator economy, not inside it. This isn't a plea to abandon creator's token, but to harness a different culture and use case that isn't attempting to turn humans into commodities. A chance to stop forcing another culture not designed for humans but embed the correct culture into the use case.
What if the intangible becomes tangible because of the tech?
The moment you felt a connection. The moment your view changed. The moment someone changed your life.
We all have influence from others: the blog that opened your eyes, that artwork that made you ponder, the speaker that changed your understanding of the world or yourself.
Think about the last time someone’s work fundamentally shifted something in you. Maybe it was a thread that reframed how you think about your career. A piece of art that surfaced an emotion you’d been suppressing. A song that became the soundtrack to a transformation you were already experiencing but couldn’t name yet.
You probably never told them. Even if you did, that moment dissolved into the stream. A like. A comment. Maybe a DM that got buried. The impact was real but the record is ephemeral.
Maybe that’s the intangible we should be recording with creator tokens. Those human moments that we can’t take a picture of but we can now preserve on a ledger.
If we expand beyond the use case of monetary reward, we find this technology may allow us to document our human-to-human connection.
Let the creator economy live on and thrive.
Buy the NFT, support the livestream, collect the blog, snag the post.
Now let’s add the creator’s connection that transcends the economy and bridges the element of us.
The financial rails exist. What we’re missing are the relational rails.
This isn’t about replacing markets with sentiment. It’s about acknowledging that influence flows through channels we’ve never been able to map. When someone’s work changes you, that’s not a transaction - it’s a transmission. And transmissions deserves its own infrastructure and purpose.
We exist in a living world where the reason we lean on social media is to connect, to engage. Creator's tokens may become representative of those moments of connection beyond the post, beyond the collected, and tracking that bond we have in our living world.
Speculation comes when we remove the us from our worldview. There’s plenty of speculation areas that exist in the casino culture, but this creator/human element may not be one of them.
This may be the pivotal moment where we come back to center and understand that the human element is what we must hold onto in a world where AI runs everything.
The thing creator's tokens provide is harnessing the tech for us, the humans, while we spotlight monetization via other tokenized vehicles. The missing focus is human and personal connection - which we constantly have a desire for, yet we keep trying to ignore it in the race to adopt everything to a token.
Gain becomes a byproduct when we prioritize connection/relationship. We fuse the intangible moments into the technology. We don't speculate or bet on success but prioritize relationships, connections, and feelings via the use of the technology.
A creator token highlights “this person or person's work changed how I see myself.” A record that says “your work was there when I needed it most.” An attestation that lives beyond platforms, beyond likes, beyond the noise.
Not because it unlocks perks. Not because it generates yield. Because the moment mattered and now it’s preserved on a ledger.
We don't need new tech. We’re simply harnessing the tech under new rules, new culture, new purpose. Thinking every use case for tokenization starts with speculation and earning capacity is limiting the ability to expand the technology.
We need to evolve cultures, not revolve around one.
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Aaron Vick
Aaron Vick
very much resonates, felt backed into a corner to deploy one because some of the features for creators are now not available to utilize without a creator coin.
creator coins are more than defining utility ————————————————————— it’s about connecting and connection capturing those moments wen u met 🤝 wen u felt we were more than charts 📊 wen u realized it’s a digital connection 🤗💎 speculate somewhere else, lets be frens https://blog.aaronvick.com/creator-tokens-transcend-the-creator-economy
🔥🔥🔥🔥
💜🍌🙌🏼🙌🏼
Bought another $5K of my own creator coin I am now #4 hodler
https://blog.aaronvick.com/creator-tokens-transcend-the-creator-economy
What’s your goal?
as much as i love exploring Base, i think your coin would’ve touched more than 10m on SOL
And after 24h also go to zero
i doubt its the same with people like him, but who knows. for sure there is a lot shit going on on SOL, but cant say Base is better in this.
You are great, you convince the community build trust 🫶
Thanks Sir ! You are spreading inspiration to many people on the Base App, including me. Respect !
lol wtf… i totally underestimated your coin. saw it sitting under 50k and didn’t ape in because i thought you were like the rest, wouldn’t help it pump. but damn… you’re a whole different breed!
Garry, do you have any plans in mind to definitively separate your token from others? Would be great if you could give a rundown on any plans you may have, as many people believe in your creator coin.
The goat 🐐
You'll also win 7-8k from the @zora trading rewards.
👀
the problem with 'coining' everything is as an individual as soon as you launch one of these things. you are now literally employed and work for the public. 4 life type shit. unless youre a massive piece of shit. then literally just die and never launch a coin. be like $jesse. confused as hell.
or we reframe the use case of creator tokens. IMO, we shouldn’t carry over the exact same culture to anything simply called “token” we can do more with the tech than turn everything/everyone into commodities but i hear ya https://blog.aaronvick.com/creator-tokens-transcend-the-creator-economy
lemme read brb
i was reading and then i was thinking. what if michael jackson had a creator coin. boy that would be even more of a nightmare for the jackson family. fans profiting off an artist long after death with nothing really going back to his legacy. insane tech.
interesting scenario, seems like a “token” evolves use cases creator launched coin as extension of themselves, community revolves around it, extension of human to human connection now onchain in passing, token becomes utility as part of the estate vs primary focus of connection makes sense. tech doesn’t change, the lens and purpose does as time moves forward
creators are not commodities. change the narrative of “get in early” with “leave a signal of impact” because support isn’t a position. It’s an acknowledgment.
really like this idea aaron!
thnx. it very heavy on my mind these days https://blog.aaronvick.com/creator-tokens-transcend-the-creator-economy
Words 👏🏻
🙏🏼 🫂
👀
Yeah
👊🏼
Yessss
🙌🏼 🙌🏼
Have many thoughts on this. I don’t think it has to be binary (content coin vs. NFT)…most likely need both for maximum value capture. Closest I’ve seen is @zguz.farcaster.eth with @coinage.farcaster.eth where there is a well thought out plan where both work in tandem. I think what Kenny has brought up is at the heart of the problem. There’s tons of tools, and yes, composability is nice but also a double edged sword. Creators want to create…they don’t want to spend time thinking through how all these things should be interlinked. And for content consumer, they don’t want to read a lite paper for each content creator on how their creator coins and NFTs work. Zack does this, Laura does that, etc. We need to better tie in all these things together in a fully buttoned up way that’s also fairly uniform and scalable. Keep it dead simple for both creators and consumers.
agreed. we already have the toolkit for the creator economy this should be dealt with in a different lens https://blog.aaronvick.com/creator-tokens-transcend-the-creator-economy
gud article
thnx!